The parties married each other in Harare on 14 December 1991 in terms of the Marriage Act [Cap 5:11]. The marriage was blessed with two children, namely Simbarashe Sithole born on 5 September 1992 (now a major) and Mutsawashe Unalina Sithole born on 5 August 1997.
There is an old saying which states that all good things come to an end. The parties now find that their marriage has irretrievably broken down. The plaintiff issued summons out of this court on 25 October 2006 seeking a degree of divorcee on the basis of irretrievable breakdown, an order of sharing matrimonial... More
The applicant in this matter was seeking a declaratur in the following terms:
“It is declared and ordered that:
1. The reappointment of the commission running the affairs of the City of Harare to serve a fourth term was unlawful, null, void and of no force and effect.
2. The appointment of an inquiring committee to inquire into the suspension of the applicant by the said commission was unlawful, null, void and of no force and effect.
3. The first respondent is not, at law, a Mayor of Harare and cannot, consequently, lawfully discharge any of the functions and exercise... More
The plaintiff issued summons against the first and the second defendants for the transfer of stand number 2974 Katanga Norton from the first defendant to himself. The first defendant was the late Joseph Nine Sithole’s wife. Joseph Nine Sithole was the original registered owner of the stand in dispute. The late Joseph Sithole died and the first defendant without advising her husband’s relatives transferred the stand from the late Joseph’s estate to herself. More
1. This is a meritless application for leave to appeal out of time and to prosecute such appeal in person.
2. Having stolen two she goats, one heifer, one steer and one he goat the applicant pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of four counts of stock theft as defined in s 114(2)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23].
3. He was sentenced as follows:
Count one: 9 months imprisonment of which 3 months imprisonment was suspended for 5 years on the usual conditions of good behavior.
The remaining 9 months imprisonment was suspended on condition... More
The plaintiff issued summons claiming US$250 000-00 being damages for malicious arrest, detention and prosecution as a result of the first defendant’s conduct during the course and scope of his employment with the second defendant. More
