The applicant was picked up by the police on Sunday 5 February 2006. He was taken to Matapi Police Station where he was detained without charge. On 6 February 2006, the investigation of the matter was turned over to the 1st respondent. On the same day around 4.30 p.m. the 1st respondent and 2nd respondents proceeded to applicant’s workplace, Dockson Investments (Private) Limited, in Shamva. In Shamva, they received information that the applicant had committed fraud or theft against his employer. The two respondents then investigated the matter and on Wednesday 8 February, took the applicant to court for his... More
In March, 2022 the first respondent successfully applied, through the urgent chamber book, for a provisional order in terms of which he interdicted the applicant from carrying out construction work at Stand number 3914, Westgate, Sandton, Harare as well as evicting the applicant from the property. He filed his suit under HC 1696/22. He sued the applicant, the second and third respondents. More
On 5 March Applicant’s application for bail came before me and after an exchange with the applicant’s counsel I dismissed the application. It is not always necessary that the bail court provides detailed reasons for the decision in an opposed application especially in those cases where the court has through an exchange with counsel made clear its reasons for the decision reached. In casu the applicant has requested reasons for the dismissal of his application for bail – these are they. More
This matter is a civil appeal against the whole judgment of the Magistrate sitting at Harare. Before the trial Magistrate, the plaintiff was the appellant herein. The respondents herein were the defendants.
The plaintiffs sought to evict the defendants from Patric House, Nelson Mandela/Fifth Street Harare. Defendants were given three months on 10 October 2022 to leave the premises. More
Under case number Mutare court CRB 1253/09 the applicant was convicted of the offence of unlawfully possessing 8,61kgs of pieces of diamonds. Pursuant to the applicant’s conviction and sentence the diamonds in question were declared forfeited to the State. More
