On 8 January 2016 this court granted a provisional order in favour of the applicant in the following;
1. That the first respondent and all those claiming occupation through it, be and are hereby barred from interfering, interrupting, disturbing and hindering the use and possession by the applicant, of Hunyani 30 Mine Hunyani Farm, Mashonaland West, pending the return date. More
This is a court application in which the applicant seeks specific performance drawn in the following terms:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Within seven days from the date of service of this order by the Sheriff of Zimbabwe the respondent shall deliver 25 200, 50 kg bags of PC 15 cement, at the applicant’s address office No. 15 1st Floor Plumpton Chambers, Hebert Chitepo Street, Mutare, failure of which the Sheriff of Zimbabwe with or without the assistance of the Zimbabwe Republic Police and (sic) is hereby authorized to effect this order.
2. That the respondent shall pay costs of... More
The applicant was charged with the offence of theft. The facts of the case read like a movie. The allegations on which the applicant was placed on remand by the magistrate at Harare on 25 January 2021 were as follows. The narrative starts with one Shadreck Njowa. He is said to have been part of the gang of armed robbers that waylaid a ZB Bank cash in transit vehicle along Harare Chinhoyi road on 6 January 2021 at the 60 kilometre peg. The cash in transit vehicle was carrying a crew of bank representatives and security guards in addition to... More
On 19 May 2016 we dismissed the appellant’s appeal with costs. The appellant requested for reasons for judgment as early as 19 May 2016 but the request was not brought to our attention until 20 March 2017, this explains the delay. The reasons for our dismissal of the appeal are hereby furnished. More
The applicant’s claim is for a provisional order seeking repossession of, equipment and motor vehicles valued at US$1 558 068, 53 and US$96 000.00 respectively. Its cause of action is based on breach of contract on account of the first respondent’s failure to pay the purchase price for the property sold in terms of the agreement of sale. More
