Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant approached the court through the urgent chamber book on 6 August 2013. The matter was set down for 15 August 2013 on which day both applicant and respondent counsel addressed the court. More

The plaintiff is the owner of certain business premises at Chisipite Shopping Centre called Lot 11 Chisipte Township Hindhead Avenue, Chisipte. In terms of a written agreement, the plaintiff leased the premises to Décor and Design in or about 1996. In March 1998, Décor and Design ceded its rights and obligations under the lease to the defendant. More

Applicant was married to the second respondent from 1986 to 2012.A divorce order was granted in 2012 which resulted in the applicant being granted a certain immovable property StandNo.13687 Harare Township. The applicant approached this court in a separate application seeking an application for declarator that was granted in her favor by my brother Judge MSITHU J. The first respondent in this matter then noted an appeal in the Supreme Court against MSITHU J’s judgement.The appeal was successful thereby setting aside MSITHU J’s judgement in HC3715/19. The first respondent has now raised special plea of res judicata in the present... More

The plaintiff claims from the defendants jointly and severally the one paying the other to be absolved, the sum of US$98 239-64. The plaintiff claims that during the period extending from 20 August 2009 to 30 September 2010, it sold and delivered goods worth US$98 239-64 to the first defendant. It claims that on 11 August 2010 the second defendant bound itself jointly and severally as a surety in solidum and co-principal debtor with the first defendant to repay, on demand by the plaintiff, all sums of money that were outstanding as at that date or became due and payable... More

On the 19th July 2017 after hearing submissions by the parties I granted the application. The reasons for my decision were as follows: The applicants approached this court on a certificate of urgency seeking the stay of execution of a provisional order the first respondent obtained in circumstances applicants described as improper. More