The applicants approached this court seeking to register an arbitral award in terms of Article 35 of the Model Law, which is contained in the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]. The application was opposed by the respondent. The background to this dispute is that: the applicants are holders of mining claims, known as the Pangolin claims. Sometime in 2015, the respondent encroached upon, and took some soil containing chrome ore. From these claims. The applicants discovered this and instituted proceedings under HC 7386/15. More
This is an opposed application in terms of which applicant Pangoula Farm P/L seeks the following declaratory orders against the City of Harare that
1) Applicant is exempt from payment of rates in respect of its property Pangoulia Farm of Stembrick in terms of s 8 (2) of Statutory Instrument 199 of 1985.
2) The purported demand of rates by the respondent in the sum of $171 299.91 is a nullity.
3) The respondent’s attempt to collect and levy sales from applicant, is therefore null and void. More
This is an application for absolution from the instance at the close of the plaintiff’s case. The plaintiff’s claim against the defendant is for payment of a sum of US$201 335.63 in respect of inputs and funding given to the defendant for the growing of soya beans and maize during the 2012/2013 agricultural season. The plaintiff also claims interest on the amount stated above at the rate of 5% per month, together with costs of suit on the attorney-client scale. The claim is contested by the first defendant. The claim against the second defendant was withdrawn with the consent of... More
On 4 July, 2017 I issued an order by consent in case number HC 3167/10. The order read as follows:
“It is ordered that:
1. A decree of divorce be and is hereby granted.
2. Custody of the parties’ minor child, Krystal Akatendeka, born on the 31st
October, 2009, be and is hereby awarded to the plaintiff, subject to the defendant’s rights of access to her at all reasonable times and upon reasonable notice having been given. More
The Magistrates Court sitting at Chitungwiza ordered the 3rd respondent to deliver to the appellant, an embroidery machine which has become the central issue in this matter. This was after the appellant had filed a court application against the 3rd respondent seeking delivery of the machine on the basis of a loan of US$4200 that the 3rd respondent had borrowed but failed to repay. The 1st respondent laid claim to the machine stating by way of an affidavit that it was hers having purchased it from the 3rd respondent resulting in the 2nd respondent causing the issuance of interpleader summons... More
