Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
This is an urgent chamber application for a spoliation order. At the hearing, the applicant applied for an amendment to the order sought in its draft order which was granted. Having struck out the interim relief, the terms of the final order sought are now as follows; “The application for spoliation be and is hereby granted. The status quo ante before the spoliation is restored and the 1st respondent and anyone acting, through them be and is hereby ordered to remove its fence over and to vacate the mining claim described as Mutaki, 10 Hectares Block, Goromonzi under Certificate of... More

Having held a pre-trial conference, I concluded the matter in favour of the plaintiffs by granting them the order prayed for which was in the following terms as per summons: More

This is an urgent application for stay of execution submitted to meon 11 November 2013. I directed that the matter be set down for 13 November 2013 in my chambers. In that day the first respondent filed his response where inter alia hepointed out that the matter had already been decided by my brother the HONOURABLE MANGOTA J in case No.8602/13. I instructed the registrar to supply me with that file and it was brought to my chambers. Upon perusal of that file, I noticed that indeed the HONOURABLE MANGOTA J had dealt with the same application for stay of... More

The respondent sued the appellant in the Magistrates Court sitting at Gweru for payment of arrear rentals in the sum of US$5 081.89, interest and costs of suit. More

Sometime in 2010 or thereabout applicant and first respondent entered into an oral lease agreement in terms of which first respondent leased a certain shop known as Bali Shoes No. 28, Angwa Street, Harare. Since then the applicant has been in undisturbed and peaceful possession, use and enjoyment of the said shop.The applicant avers that on Friday 22November 2013, and in violation of the provisions of s 24 of the Commercial Premises (Rent) Regulations, 1983, the first respondent has unlawfully and wrongfully prevented the applicant from possessing, using or occupying the said shop. She claimed that first respondent’s conduct was... More