This is an application to set aside a judicial sale in terms of Rule 359 of the High Court of Zimbabwe Rules, 1971. The applicant is the judgment debtor, his property was attached and sold in execution. The applicant seeks to set aside an agreement of sale entered into between the first respondent, the seller of the property in issue who is the Sheriff of the High Court of Zimbabwe and the authority charged with conducting judicial sales in execution, (the Sheriff) and the third respondent. The third respondent is the buyer of the property whilst the fourth respondent is... More
On 23 June 2004 under Case No. HC 8385/03 this court issued an order in favour of the second respondent herein in default of appearance of the first, third and fourth respondents herein. The order was corrected by an order issued by this court under Case No. HC 4071/06 dated 26 July 2006. The correction was intended to give effect to the execution of the order of 23 June 2004.
The orders described above entitled the second respondent to have the right title and interest in certain immovable property, namely 221A Nedlaw Suburbs, Rimuka transferred from the first and fourth... More
This is an urgent chamber application for stay of execution being made pursuant to the applicant’s property having been attached by the second respondent, the Sheriff of Zimbabwe on the instructions of the first respondent. When the applicant filed this application, the Sheriff was about to remove the attached property, namely six motor vehicles and a motor bike. More
In the main, the plaintiff, ASP Marketing, claims against the first and second defendants, Lunar Chickens and Gideon Gono respectively, jointly and severally, payment of the sum of US$2 201 044-05, together with interest thereon at the prescribe rate. The claim is for the balance of the purchase price for goods sold and delivered, namely maize grain and soya beans. This followed a contract between ASP Marketing and Lunar Chickens duly represented by Gideon Gono. ASP Marketing seeks the piercing of Lunar Chickens’ corporate veil to make Gideon Gono personally liable for the same debt jointly with Lunar Chickens. This... More
There have been a number of developments in this case from the time of summons commencing action up to the time this matter was eventually heard on 26 September 2012. More
