The dispute between the parties is steeped in the realm of employment law. The bare bones are that applicant who is the largest shareholder in second respondent with a 19.42% shareholding, used to be employed by second respondent as the managing director - (This in fact constitutes the main bone of contention between the parties – respondents aver that applicant verbally resigned the post in early 2010 as can be gleaned from minutes of a meeting held on 3 May, 2010 chaired by the applicant at which he introduced doctor Saungweme who took over from him as the new managing... More
The Applicant (respondent in this appeal) filed an application in the Magistrates Court seeking inter alia restoration of the status quo ante before the spoliation and that the respondents (Appellants in this matter) and anyone acting through them be ordered to vacate the property known as Lot 1 of Lot 2 of Derbyshire, Harare. The applicant also wanted the Respondents interdicted and restrained from asking, encouraging or instructing any of their employees or agents from visiting or invading the mentioned property, and that they be interdicted and restrained from visiting the property of the Applicant. In opposing the application, Respondents... More
This is a court application for a declaratory relief declaring that members of the Zimbabwe Republic Police are acting unlawfully by spiking public and private motor vehicles in urban areas, particularly in Harare, are acting unlawfully by smashing the windscreens of public and private motor vehicles alleged to be infringing the law and are acting unlawfully by applying excessive force in dealing with alleged road traffic infractions in urban areas, particularly in Harare central business district. The Applicants are seeking an interdict prohibiting members of the Zimbabwe Republic Police employed by the second Respondent and working under the command of... More
