Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
this is an application for a provisional order by the applicant in the following terms:- “TERMS OF TIMBER OF THE ORDER SOUGHT AND GRANTED Pending the finalization of this matter: 1. The sixth and seventh respondents or anybody claiming through them be and I hereby interdicted from processing or acting upon the affidavit of resignation filed and signed by the applicant on 5 July 2008 at Nyamaropa. 2. The first, third, fourth and fifth respondents and anybody claiming through them be and are hereby interdicted from harassing, intimidating, assault and applying unlawful pressure or his lawful agents with the aim... More

The respondent is the applicant’s tenant. The parties are engaged in litigation under case Number HC 5940/2010 wherein the applicant has instituted eviction proceedings against the respondent. More

HC 9129/19 and HC 6/20 were filed as separate cases. They deal with substantially the same dominant parties and the issue of an immovable property. It was because of the stated matter that the two cases were consolidated with a view to having them heard together. The consolidation was at the instance of the applicant with the consent of the respondents. More

The parties squabble over copyright. The plaintiff pursued only the claims against the first defendant, the Harare Institute of Technology, [HIT], a tertiary institution established in terms of Zimbabwean law and the second defendant, a chemical engineering lecturer at HIT, (the defendants). The plaintiff a graduate and former student of HIT obtained a chemical and process systems engineering degree in 2015 form HIT. In fulfilment of the degree, she submitted a project titled, “Design of a Plant Producing 24TPD Fuel Briquettes from Cornstover”, and [the project]. The second and third defendant also a lecturer, supervised her project. More

The appellant was convicted, on his own guilty plea of contravening s 89 (1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. He was sentenced to 24 months imprisonment of which 3 years were suspended on condition of future good behaviour. Aggrieved by the conviction and sentence he appealed against both. More