The first applicant borrowed money from the first respondent, to whom he surrendered Pelhams shares belonging to the second to the fourth applicants as security for the loan. He gave out the shares in a negotiable form. The applicants had signed share transfer forms, making it possible for the first respondent to transfer them to himself or a third party. More
At the hearing of this matter, and in his heads of argument the first respondent raised two points in limine. The first point in limine being that there is material disputes of facts which cannot be resolved on papers. He suggested that this matter could not be resolved in a motion court but by way of trial procedure. More
In presiding over matters, judicial officers are duly obliged to be impartial and ensure in all instances that justice is done. A magistrate presiding over a matter has to ensure fairness in conducting proceedings. Both procedural and substantive aspects pertaining to adjudication of matters have to be considered and adhered to. It cannot be said this obtained in this particular instance. More
This matter was initially placed before me on the unopposed motion matter. The applicant seeks the placement of the 1st-3rd respondents under supervision and commencement of corporate rescue proceedings in terms of section 124 of the Insolvency Act [Chapter 6:07]. More
: This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Harare magistrates court delivered on 28 October 2011 in which the magistrates court set aside a default judgment which had been granted in the appellant’s favour.
The facts giving rise to the appeal can be summarised as follows:- More
