The applicant seeks payment of US$13 917-00 from the respondent with interest at the rate of 6% per annum calculated from date of demand to date of payment in full.
What engendered the dispute is the following: More
I dismissed this opposed application at the close of submissions on 8 February 2011 and indicated that my reasons for doing so would follow. I state them hereunder. More
Applicant is employed by the respondent as its Division Chief-in-charge of Financial markets. She has been employed by the respondent since 1980 in various capacities. She has approached this court seeking an order declaring the disciplinary proceedings initiated by the respondent against her as a nullity and an order compelling the respondent to comply with the provisions of section 2(6)(b) as read with section 8 of Statutory Instrument 186 of 2003, Labour Relations (Retrenchment Regulations) 2003. More
This is an appeal from a decision by a Magistrate in an inquiry purportedly to confirm whether Tiresi Chasara was customarily married to the Late Elias Macheka or not. More
The first applicant borrowed money from the first respondent, to whom he surrendered Pelhams shares belonging to the second to the fourth applicants as security for the loan. He gave out the shares in a negotiable form. The applicants had signed share transfer forms, making it possible for the first respondent to transfer them to himself or a third party. More
