The applicant was employed by the first respondent as its Managing Director. The second to fourth respondent were colleagues and fellow employees of the first respondent, being the chief Executive Officer, Production Director and Human Resources Director respectively.
On 23 July, 2008, certain allegations of a criminal nature were made against the applicant by his colleagues. The applicant was taken by the police and whilst in custody, the respondents gained access to his computer and transferred therefrom a number of files and information onto their computers. This they did after “cracking” the applicant’s password and rendering it dysfunctional in the... More
The applicant in this matter was married in terms of customary law to one Alice Mukowamombe in April 1986. In 2001 the applicant moved out of the matrimonial home and commenced to live with another woman as his wife. Alice Mukowamombe (hereinafter referred to as the deceased) died intestate on 11 June 2007. She was survived by three children two of whom she had More
The plaintiff claims against the defendants jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved, payment of the sum of US$3 000. The basis for claiming the said amount is framed in the following terms: “being the amount the defendants undertook to pay Plaintiff for his participation and role in the HIV and AIDS documentary ‘Pain in My Heart’, which despite demand, the defendants have refused, neglected and /or failed to pay.” The plaintiff contends that the claim is based on a verbal agreement entered into between the parties in early 2007 in which agreement the second defendant... More
The first and second applicants have been embroiled in a dispute with the first respondent from as far back as 2019. At the center of their dispute is a piece of land which is known as Subdivision 2 of Erling Farm, Seke, Beatrice {‘the farm’}. On 1 October 2021, the dispute in which only the first respondent, on the one hand, and the first and the second applicants, on the other, were involved escalated itself to the third to twenty-fifth applicants whom the first respondent moved to evict from the farm together with the first and second applicants. He premised... More
