This is an application for an order evicting the 1st respondent from Stand No. 15724, Unit “P” Seke, Chitungwiza, and all others claiming rights of occupation in the stand. The applicant also seeks cession of the 1st respondent’s rights, interests and title in the stand to herself. More
: The applicant seeks, by way of an urgent chamber application, variation or correction of a judgment handed down by this Court on 14 January 2022, under Case No. HC 7099/21, Judgment No. HH 39-22.
In that judgment, the court ordered a stay of execution of an order granted by this court on 2 November 2021 per KWENDA J, MUCHAWA J and CHILIMBE J, under Case No. CIV “A” 77/21. Execution of this order was suspended pending the determination of an application for its rescission filed under Case No. HC 9097/21. The application for rescission was filed in terms of... More
The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant claiming a total of USD32 861.00 (Thirty – two Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty – One United States Dollars), being an amount arising from personal loans advanced to the defendant in August 2017 and June 2019, plus interest at the prescribed rate from the due date of payment to the date of final payment.
The plaintiff seeks an order compelling the defendant to settle the loan obligation in United States dollars (USD), arguing that the loan was a foreign obligation not affected by the provisions of Statutory Instrument 33 of 2019 (“SI 33/19”)... More
The applicant seeks a rescission of a default judgment granted by this court on 22 September 2014. In terms of the order the applicant was to pay US$17 255.41 with interest at the rate of 6% from 19 February 2014 to the date of full and final settlement.
It is not in dispute that the respondent issued out summons commencing action which was served on applicant on 19 May 2014. The applicant did not file any opposing papers. The respondent applied for a default judgment which was granted. A writ of execution was issued for the attachment of applicant’s moveable... More
The applicants approached this court seeking to register an arbitral award in terms of Article 35 of the Model Law, which is contained in the Arbitration Act [Chapter 7:15]. The application was opposed by the respondent. The background to this dispute is that: the applicants are holders of mining claims, known as the Pangolin claims. Sometime in 2015, the respondent encroached upon, and took some soil containing chrome ore. From these claims. The applicants discovered this and instituted proceedings under HC 7386/15. More
