The Applicant (respondent in this appeal) filed an application in the Magistrates Court seeking inter alia restoration of the status quo ante before the spoliation and that the respondents (Appellants in this matter) and anyone acting through them be ordered to vacate the property known as Lot 1 of Lot 2 of Derbyshire, Harare. The applicant also wanted the Respondents interdicted and restrained from asking, encouraging or instructing any of their employees or agents from visiting or invading the mentioned property, and that they be interdicted and restrained from visiting the property of the Applicant. In opposing the application, Respondents... More
This is a court application for a declaratory relief declaring that members of the Zimbabwe Republic Police are acting unlawfully by spiking public and private motor vehicles in urban areas, particularly in Harare, are acting unlawfully by smashing the windscreens of public and private motor vehicles alleged to be infringing the law and are acting unlawfully by applying excessive force in dealing with alleged road traffic infractions in urban areas, particularly in Harare central business district. The Applicants are seeking an interdict prohibiting members of the Zimbabwe Republic Police employed by the second Respondent and working under the command of... More
this is an application for a provisional order by the applicant in the following terms:-
“TERMS OF TIMBER OF THE ORDER SOUGHT AND GRANTED
Pending the finalization of this matter:
1. The sixth and seventh respondents or anybody claiming through them be and I hereby interdicted from processing or acting upon the affidavit of resignation filed and signed by the applicant on 5 July 2008 at Nyamaropa.
2. The first, third, fourth and fifth respondents and anybody claiming through them be and are hereby interdicted from harassing, intimidating, assault and applying unlawful pressure or his lawful agents with the aim... More
The respondent is the applicant’s tenant. The parties are engaged in litigation under case Number HC 5940/2010 wherein the applicant has instituted eviction proceedings against the respondent. More
HC 9129/19 and HC 6/20 were filed as separate cases. They deal with substantially the same dominant parties and the issue of an immovable property. It was because of the stated matter that the two cases were consolidated with a view to having them heard together. The consolidation was at the instance of the applicant with the consent of the respondents. More
