Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant filed the above application on 9 October 2002, seeking an order restraining the respondents from interfering in the applicant’s relationship with its staff and specifically barring the respondents from representing the interest of its staff in matters affecting conditions of service of its staff. The application was opposed. More

The applicant (“POSB”) prays for an order in the following terms; - i) “Condonation of the late filing of an application for rescission of a default judgment entered into on 27 January 2023 under HCHC 485/22 (“application for condonation”); and ii) The rescission of the said default judgment under HCHC 485/22 (“application for rescission”). More

On the 12th of March 2021, I discharged in an ex tempore judgment an application to confirm a provisional order sought by the applicants. I have been requested to give reasons and these are they. More

The applicant Peppy Motors (Private) Limited is seeking an order that- “1. The 1st and 2nd Respondents or any of their agents and or employees, or anyone acting on their behalf or on his own are ordered to release and restore possession into the applicant and or its agents or employees’ custody within two (2) days of this order failure which the Sheriff of the High Court is hereby ordered and directed to do all things possible to restore possession and cause release into Applicant or its agents or, its employees’ custody and possession of the following motor vehicles:- a.... More

The applicant seeks the rescission of a judgment entered against him in default by this court on 26 June 2008. The effect of the order was to cause the eviction of the applicant and all those claiming occupation through him from residential premises described in the order as 1075 Chipadze Township Bindura. Only the first respondent opposed the application and I will hereinafter refer to it as the respondent. The facts which are common cause are as follows. The applicant was until November 2007 employed by the respondent. By dint of his status as an employee the applicant was allocated... More