This is an urgent chamber application in which the relief sought is that the respondent be interdicted from filling the applicant’s position of Chief Executive Officer pending the determination of another court application filed under case number HC11003-16 between the same parties. The final order sought was amended at the hearing of the matter to be one for costs of suit. The applicant is a male adult who describes himself as having been in the respondent’s employ for ‘many decades’ in terms of a contract of employment entered into between himself and the respondent, a company incorporated in terms of... More
On the 17th of November, 2022, I granted an ex tempore judgment in in this contested application for review, in favor of the applicants after hearing arguments from the parties. These are the reasons for judgement following a request by the respondents through the Registrar of the High court. An unopposed application for the condonation of late filing of heads and upliftment of bar by the respondents was successfully granted by this court. More
This is an appeal against the whole judgment of the Magistrate’s Court in which the court a quo granted an application in favour of the 1st respondent (Mavetera) for the rectification of the register in terms of section 162 of the Companies and Other Business Entities Act (the Act) [Chapter 24:31]. More
This is an urgent chamber application for a provisional interdict.
The facts are that on 10 July 2013 I dealt with the matter on the unopposed roll. The applicant who is the first respondent in this matter had applied for a provisional sentence on a liquid document namely an acknowledgement of debt by all the respondents (some of the applicants in this matter). The draft order was headed “Order by Consent” and its first paragraph reads:- “1. The Deed of settlement under HC 4283/13 be and is hereby made an order of this Court”. I raised a query relating to... More
