Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant instituted the instant application seeking an order interdicting the second respondent or any person acting on his behalf or in furtherance of his interests from interfering with the applicant’s occupation of the property described in the papers as 126 Edgmore Road, Park Meadowlands, Hatfield, Harare. More

This is an urgent court application in which the applicant seeks the following relief: “TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT That the First Respondent shows cause why a final order should not be granted in the following terms: 1. The Application be and is hereby granted 2. The Execution of the Default Judgment granted on the 21st of June; 2022 under Case No MC 39520/16 against the Applicant be and is hereby stayed pending the determination of the Application for Rescission of Default Judgment under Case No SC 237/22 3. There shall be no order to costs More

: The plaintiff issued summons on 10 March 2008 claiming from the defendant adultery damages in the sum of ZW$400 billion, being a sum of Z$200 billion for contumelia and a sum of Z$200 billion for loss of consortium. The basis of the claim was that the defendant committed adultery with her husband Stanley Chiwandamira from 1981 to the date of summons. As a result of the adultery, the plaintiff lost the love, affection, society and companionship and services of her husband. She also suffered pain and indignity during that period at the hands of the defendant. Her husband has,... More

These matters were referred to me in chambers and as the parties were the same and the issues from the matters identical I decided to hear them together. More

The plaintiff company, Rieton Investments (Private) Limited deals in the supply of horticultural products. The defendants, who were formerly directors in Southern Flowers (Pvt) Ltd, are being sued in their personal capacities by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is claiming payment of the sum of US$113,416-12 for goods it sold and delivered to Southern Flowers. The plaintiff’s claim against the defendants is predicated upon s 318 of the Companies Act [Chapter 24:03] which provides that company directors can be sued in their personal capacities for damages arising from the fraudulent, reckless and/or grossly negligent conduct in the carrying on of a... More