This is a court application in which the 2 applicants who are former members of the Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO) seek an order in the following terms:
“IT IS ORDERED THAT: More
The determination of urgency in this matter depends on the efficacy of applicable domestic remedies. Are the remedies concerned “effective, available and adequate” ? The remedies under examination are reposed in the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act [ Chapter 22:23] (“the Act”). More
On 5 July 2016, upon considering the record of proceedings, heads of argument and hearing oral submissions we upheld the appeal and made the following order:
“It is ordered that:
1. The appeal be and is hereby upheld.
2. The decision of the court a quo is set aside and substituted as follows:
(i) the respondent and all those claiming occupation through the respondent be and are hereby ordered to vacate from No. TT 2455 Madamombe Business Center Seke, Goromonzi within (21) days of the granting of this order.
(ii) the respondent shall pay the appellant’s costs.” More
On 24 November 2010 I issued a Provisional Order under Case No HC 8153/10 in favour of the first, second and third respondents herein. The applicant, the fourth and fifth respondents and one Wonder Killian Jakalasi were the respondents therein. The applicant intends to note an appeal against the order granted and has approached me for leave to note the appeal. The respondents filed papers wherein they opposed the grant of leave sought and I therefore directed that the parties file heads of argument for my assistance. More
In this application the applicant prays for the following order:-
“IT IS ORDERED against both respondents jointly and severally the one paying and the other to be absolved:
1. That respondents forthwith deliver to applicant 913 253 shares in OK Zimbabwe Limited 370 356 in Pelhams Limited and 46 025 in Old Mutual PLC;
2. Costs of the Court Application”. More
