Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
SERE (PRIVATE) LIMITED VERSUS HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED AND ERNEST & ASHTON HC 8001/03 2. HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED VERSUS CHIWENGA ESTATES (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 4 OTHERS HC 5830/03 AND BON ESPOIR (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND O MATAMBA HC 6318/03 AND BON ESPOIR (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND CCHITIMA HC 5796/03 3. TRIANGLE LIMITED AND HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED VERSUS ER HARRISON AND 4 OTHERS HC 10028/03 AND 4. HIPPO VALLEY ESTATES LIMITED VERSUS CHIREDZI NOMINEES (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 22 OTHERS HC 5831/03 AND CHIREDZI RANCHING CO. (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 8 OTHERS HC 5821/03 AND CHIREDZI RANCHING COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 2 OTHERS HC 6311/03 AND DENHARII (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 4 OTHERS HC 5804/03 AND LYNDHURST ESTATE (PRIVATE LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS HC 6321/03 AND L.T. ENGELS (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS HC 6320/03 AND RIO ENTERPRISES & 5 OTHERS HC 5811/03 AND MARATHAN ESTATES (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 3 OTHERS HC 5806/03 AND MAPANZA ESTATES (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 32 OTHERS HC 5823/03 AND KWAINGWE FARMS (PRIVATE) LIMITED AND 10 OTHERS HC 5824/03 AND ESPERANCE ESTATE LIMITED AND PATRICK M SIBANDA HC 5805/03 AND FANTAISE FARMS (PRIVATE) LIMITED & 18 OTHERS HC 5794/03 (2006-05-24)
The applicant Hippo Valley Estates Limited is a Sugar Cane Miller obliged by law to accept sugar cane from growers for milling at its mills. The first respondent in almost all the cases owned farms or settlements on which the rest of the respondents claimed to have been resettled by the government. The respondents delivered sugar cane to applicant for milling. After having accepted the sugar cane for milling the applicant was faced with two competing claims; from the 1st respondents and from the rest of the respondents. It was in these circumstances that the applicant instituted these interpleader proceedings More

In this opposed application for review, applicant is seeking an order for the setting aside of both the conviction and sentence imposed on him by the respondents, the permanent stay of the prosecution of his offence in violation of paragraph 34 of the schedule to the Police Act [Chapter11:08], and cost of suit. More

This is an application for a declaratur. The applicants want this Honourable Court to make a declaration that the refusal or failure to reinstate the applicants to the Police Service by the respondents be and is hereby declared to be unlawful, wrongful, and that the respondents be ordered to pay costs of suit on a punitive scale. More

The applicant, former member of the Zimbabwe Republic Police (ZRP), is seeking an order to be reinstated into the ZRP and for payment of costs on the attorney-client scale. The application is opposed by the respondents. More

Plaintiff, an incola, issued summons in April 2004 against first and second defendants both peregrine, claiming damages arising out of a motor vehicle collision that occurred in Harare on 8 February 2004. In early 2006 the defendants raised special plea to the jurisdiction of the court. That special plea was upheld. On April 2006 plaintiff made a chamber application in terms of which on 10 October 2006, this court issued an order attaching certain of second defendant’s mechanical horses and trailers specified in the order. On 1 December 2006, plaintiff withdrew the proceedings in HC 4819/04 and filed the present... More