The applicants approached this court seeking an order couched in the following manner:
“1. The 1st Respondent be and is hereby compelled to allow the Applicant access to inspect and make copies of all the documents contained within the files of the mining claims: More
Defendant (the parties) entered into a registered civil marriage on 30 April 1994 and were blessed with two children who have since reached majority status. On 17 February 2020, Plaintiff issued summons against the Defendant claiming a decree of divorce and ancillary relief. In his declaration, Plaintiff stated that the parties have not lived together as husband and wife for a period exceeding twelve (12) months, have now lost love and affection for each other and reconciliation is no longer possible. Plaintiff also stated that, during the subsistence of their marriage, the Defendant and himself acquired one immovable property namely... More
The first respondent instituted proceedings in the magistrates court against the applicants for their eviction. The eviction order was granted after the court had heard the parties. The applicants noted an appeal challenging the magistrate’s decision on the merits as well as on the basis that the first respondent had no locus standi in the matter. The first respondent applied for leave to execute the eviction order pending appeal. The application was granted. More
The applicant approached the court through the urgent chamber book seeking stay of execution of an eviction order issued by the magistrate court. In specific terms the applicant sought:
TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER
That you show cause why an order in the following terms should not be granted;
1. The eviction of the applicants be and is hereby stayed pending finalisation of the application for review filed with this Honourable court under case No. HC 7542/17 More
