This is an application for summary judgment wherein the applicant seeks the following relief:-
(a) An order evicting the respondent from premises known as 36 Miranzi Road, Kambanji, Harare.
(b) Payment of arrear rentals in the sum of US$16 00 for the months of July 2009 to December 2009.
(c) Holding over damages at the rate of US$300 monthly from January 2010 up to the time the respondent vacates or is enacted from the premises, and
(d) Costs of suit. More
This is an appeal against part of the judgment of the Magistrate sitting at Harare Civil Magistrate court on 7 December 2021.The second appellant and the respondent are husband and wife married on 22 September 1993 under [Chapter 5:11] and their marriage still subsists. See exhibit 1 (the marriage certificate). Both jointly owned Stand Number 5868 Westlea, Harare, and regarded it as their matrimonial home as per exhibit 2 (the memorandum of agreement signed by the parties). The first appellant and the respondent are blood sisters. More
This is an application for the joinder of the first respondent as a third party in Case No. HC 12970/12. The application was instituted in terms of Order 14 Rule 93 of the Rules of this Court. The application is opposed by the first respondent. After hearing argument from counsel I granted the relief sought with some amendments to the draft order and gave brief reasons. I indicated to the parties that my full written reasons would be given upon the request of either party. The first respondent has written a letter requesting to be furnished with the written reasons... More
The plaintiff in this case seeks the delivery of two new Toyota Hilux IMV motor vehicles in terms of an agreement of sale between the parties. In the alternative, it claims damages for breach of contract based on the current market value of the vehicles in the sum of US$107,825.15. The defendant denies having entered into any agreement of sale and avers that the plaintiff engaged the defendant as its agent in sourcing the vehicles from third party suppliers. More
The plaintiff’s declaration reads:-
“1. The plaintiff’s claim is for payment of the balance owing in respect of a running account for various transactions.
2. On or about 07 November 2008, Mr Nhemachena who was the financial
advisor of the defendant drew up two reconciliation (sic) which are
annexed hereto marked “A” and “B”.
3. That the reconciliations so prepared were agreed between the plaintiff and the defendant.
4. In respect of annexure “A” the balance of $32 074.13 was reduced by a
payment of $8 000.00 and in respect of annexure “B” the amount of $30
360.26 was reduced... More
