At the conclusion of the trial in this matter, the parties requested to file written submissions. I directed that the plaintiff’s closing submissions be filed by 7 March 2013 while those of the defendant should be filed after that. I have only had sight of the defendant’s closing submissions but those of the plaintiff have not been brought to my attention. More
Plaintiff and first defendant married on 8 April 2000 and divorced by order of the United Kingdom Family Court at Dudley on 17 September 2017. Second defendant is a brother to the first defendant. More
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
Pending the finalization of the divorce proceedings filed by applicant under case No. HC 1600/22:
1. 1st Respondent be and is hereby interdicted from interfering with applicant’s running of 3rd respondent’s business affairs carried out at Shop 14 Bulawayo Centre, JMN Nkomo Street and 9th Avenue/Fort Street and 10th Avenue, Bulawayo.
2. 1st Respondent be and hereby barred from interfering or tampering with the lease agreement between 3rd respondent and National Railways of Zimbabwe Contributory Pension Fund.
3. 1st respondent... More
This application is premised on the following grounds, that:
1. Respondent’s decision to cancel applicant’s certificates of registration number 46035 to 36038 commonly known as Botha Mine 1 to 4 is procedurally unfair in that respondent did not provide reasons for his decision to cancel the certificates.
2. Respondent’s decision to cancel the certificates is vitiated by gross irregularity in the proceedings in that applicant was not informed of the outcome of the survey process done on 28 May 2021, and was not given an opportunity to be heard on such outcome. The survey process was important and was used... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interdict against the first respondent. The second respondent is the Sheriff of Zimbabwe whilst the third respondent is the Officer-in-Charge ZRP Bindura (Minerals and Boarder Control Unit). The first respondent opposed the application, and in doing so, raised some preliminary points which are as follows.
Matter is not urgent More
