The applicant approached the court through the urgent book on 01 February 2013. The Judge court directed that the matter be set down for hearing on 04 February 2013, on which date the respondent’s legal practitioner Mr Samukange successfully applied for postponement of the matter to 06 February 2013 to enable him to take full instructions from his clients one of who was said to be out of the country. On 06 February 2013 the respondents filed opposition to the application. The applicant in that application sought an interim relief that;- More
The applicant seeks an order setting aside an award rendered by the second respondent. The arbitral award was rendered following a dispute arising from the implementation of an agreement for the sale of shares between applicant and first respondent. Second respondent was the appointed arbitrator. Applicant and the first respondent are both mining entities of high repute. The application was made in terms of Article 34 (2)(ii) of the Model Law to the Arbitration Act. The arbitral award is impugned on the basis that it offends the public policy of Zimbabwe. More
This is application made in terms of s 213 of the Companies Act [Chapter 24:03]for leave to institute proceedings against the respondent, a company in liquidation. Should leave be granted, the applicant intends to file an application in terms of r 449 of the High Court Rules 1971, for correction of a default judgment entered against it in in favour of the respondent on 12 March 2014. A draft of the application to be filed once the anticipated leave was submitted with applicant’s papers.The application, should leave be granted, will be a second bite since an earlier attempt in the... More
This is a chamber application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court in terms of r 94(8) as read with r 60(1) of the High Court Rules, 2021. The applicant intends to appeal part of the judgment of the court relating to the dismissal of the points in limine raised by the applicant, as the first respondent in the urgent chamber application in Case No. HCH 3619/25 and the grant of the provisional order, which was an interim interdict in nature. The judgment thereof was handed down on 5 August 2025 as number HH 467-25. The applicant seeks the... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an order interdicting the first respondent from carrying out any exploration and or mining operations including excavating, extracting and carting away coal or any other mineral from the Reserved area 1035 (RA1035) measuring 56 203 hectares and the area covered by Special Grant 849 in the Bulawayo mining district. On the return date the applicants seek an order declaring that the first respondent has no right to prospect and peg in the area referred to above and for first respondent and all persons
claiming occupation through it to be ordered to vacate the... More
