Electronic Court judgements

Browse Court Judgements by court

The applicant and the first respondent as cited in the heading are duly incorporated companies in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The two companies are at logger heads over mining titles and rights to mining claims described as: a) Rushinga Dolomite 2 Reg No. 37309 BM b) Rushinga Dolomite 3 Reg No. 37312 BM c) Rushinga Dolomite 3A Reg No. 37313 BM d) Rushinga Dolomite 4 Reg No. 37311 BM e) Rushinga Dolomite 5 Reg No. 37310 BM f) Rushinga Dolomite 6 Reg No. 37308 BM g) Rushinga Dolomite 7 Reg No. 37307 BM The applicant prays for an... More

On 14 December 2016 the plaintiff issued summons against the defendant, a peregrine, in terms of which it sought to recover the sum of $30 963.95 being the value of a consignment that was consumed by the defendant. It also claimed interest at the prescribed rate and costs of suit. More

Defendant brought an urgent chamber application seeking a provisional order under which the following interim relief is sought. “1. That the respondent be and is hereby prohibited from suspending the applicant’s agent’s bond pending the return date of this order. 2. That the respondent be and is hereby prohibited from suspending the applicant’s bond unless and until the respondent has complied with the provisions under section 3 (2) as read with section 216A of the Customs and Excise Act [Chapter 23:02]. 3. That the respondent be and is hereby prohibited from suspending the applicant’s Agent’s bond until such time the... More

Applicant who resides in Germany approached this court seeking the appointment of one Pepukai Mabundu as a curator ad litem of Samantha Mercy Muriva (Samantha), born on 14 September 1996. Applicant and 1st Respondent are the biological parents of Samantha. More

OTC International GmbH (the plaintiff in case number HC 11514/16) (the first respondent herein) issued summons for the recovery of the sum of USD673 146.24. The applicant entered appearance to defend and raised three special pleas and pleaded over on merits. The matter progressed to pretrial conference stage and on the date of the pretrial conference, the applicant did not attend and its plea was struck out and judgment was entered against it in default on 2 March 2018. The applicant learnt about the default judgment on 5 March 2018. This application is for rescission of that judgment. More