Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant approached this court seeking an order for specific performance. More particularly, the relief sought by the applicant is couched in the following way: “1. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of applicant as against 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents, jointly and severally, the one paying and the other to be absolved. (a) That Respondents be and are hereby ordered to surrender the Applicant’s title deeds held in the name of the Applicant under deed of transfer 4373/2012 to the Applicant. (b) that any encumbrance placed on the said property, be and is hereby set aside. (c)... More

The plaintiff instituted proceedings against the defendant, a minibus driver who has since died, and the second defendant, the owner of a minibus registration number WPPG 938GP registered in South Africa, for damages in the sums of US$7 865-89 special damages, US$30 000-00 for pain and suffering, permanent disability and loss of amenities of life, US$10 000-00 for future medical expenses and US$20 000-00 for loss of earning capacity. More

This is a claim for damages arising out of a road traffic accident which took place along the Harare-Bulawayo highway on 7 December 2013. The accident involved a head-on collision between a bus belonging to the second defendant and a haulage truck More

This application was filed as an urgent chamber application and although I had misgivings about its urgency I decided to set it down because it concerned a project of national interest. I therefore felt that I could not do justice to such an important matter by declining to hear it on my preliminary view that it did not deserve to be heard on an urgent basis. For this reason I directed that it be set down so that the parties could ventilate on the issue of urgency. More

Applicant has instituted an urgent chamber application against first, second and third respondent claiming a provisional order in the following terms:- Terms of final order sought That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be granted that (1) The applicant be declared the rightful owner of the mine called Virginia 2 registration number 4588 in Kadoma and Virginia 7 registration number 4589 in Kadoma. (2) That the first respondent pay costs on a legal practitioner and client scale. Interim order granted. (1) The Notice issued in the Government gazette published on the 8th January... More