Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant has approached this Court in terms of S 98(14) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] for registration of an arbitral award. The draft order for the present application is as follows: “1. The arbitral award dated 28 May 2012 by the Arbitrator Ms L. Chibvongodze and quantified by the Arbitrator Mrs L. Sigauke on 1 March 2016 be and is hereby registered as an order of this Honourable Court. 2. The respondent shall pay the applicant a total sum of $72 000.00 (Seventy-two thousand Dollars) in terms of arbitral award. 3. Here shall be no order as to... More

The applicant approached this court seeking an order for specific performance. More particularly, the relief sought by the applicant is couched in the following way: “1. Judgment be and is hereby entered in favour of applicant as against 1st, 2nd and 3rd Respondents, jointly and severally, the one paying and the other to be absolved. (a) That Respondents be and are hereby ordered to surrender the Applicant’s title deeds held in the name of the Applicant under deed of transfer 4373/2012 to the Applicant. (b) that any encumbrance placed on the said property, be and is hereby set aside. (c)... More

The plaintiff instituted proceedings against the defendant, a minibus driver who has since died, and the second defendant, the owner of a minibus registration number WPPG 938GP registered in South Africa, for damages in the sums of US$7 865-89 special damages, US$30 000-00 for pain and suffering, permanent disability and loss of amenities of life, US$10 000-00 for future medical expenses and US$20 000-00 for loss of earning capacity. More

This is a claim for damages arising out of a road traffic accident which took place along the Harare-Bulawayo highway on 7 December 2013. The accident involved a head-on collision between a bus belonging to the second defendant and a haulage truck More

This application for a declaratur was made in terms of s 14 of the High Court Act [Chapter 7:06], and the applicant petitioned the court to declare null and void, a certificate of registration in respect of nine gold reefs that were registered in the name of the first respondent. The declaratur was sought on the grounds that the claim was registered on ground that was not open to prospecting and pegging and that it was registered in violation of the prior pegger principle. The applicant and the first respondent are both mining entities registered in accordance with the laws... More