The first respondent is the registered owner of an immovable property known as Lot 2 of Lot 20A Waterfalls Induna which is 4195 square metres in extent. On 25 August 2008 the first respondent gave a mandate to the second respondent to dispose of the property on his behalf. The second respondent is a registered estate agent. It seems as if the second respondent already had buyers on its books for a property such as the first respondent had on offer, because on 26 August 2008 an offer was received from the applicant for the purchase of the property. The... More
Applicant approached the court on an urgent basis seeking restoration of custody in terms of s 5 (2) of the Guardianship of Minors Amendment Act of 2022, pending the finalization of the divorce matter under reference HC 4252/21. More
The applicant approached this court on an urgent basis seeking to temporary interdict the respondent from closing its bank accounts pending the return date. The provisional order sought is couched in the following terms:
TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT
That you show cause to this Honourable Court why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
It is declared that sanctions issued under Executive Order 13818 of the United States Government and the Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List by the United States of America’s Office of Foreign Assets Control under the Global Magnisky Program or... More
This application was initially set down for 18 June, 2018. It was postponed to 2 July, 2018 at the instance of the applicant. I heard the application on the mentioned date. I delivered an ex tempore judgment in which I dismissed the same with costs. More
: Before the hearing of this matter, parties had engaged each other and on the date of hearing 11 November 2024, they submitted that an order by consent be issued covering the following:-
1. that the exception succeeds with the plaintiff being granted 5 (five) days to amend its summons.
2. that the parties engage and conclude on statement of agreed facts addressing the special plea of res judicata.
3. that either plaintiff or first Defendant may file supplementary heads of argument addressing res judicata.
4. that the court determines the matter on the special plea, on the papers filed... More
