The applicant Tapiwa Mangoma is an attested member of the Zimbabwe Republic Police based at Beitbridge Urban Police Station in Beitbridge. He applies for bail in respect of three counts of “Armed” robbery as defined in s 126 of the Criminal Law 9codifuication & Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. In terms of s 126 aforesaid there is no offence called “armed robbery.” The offence is defined as robbery, which in terms subs 3 of s 126, if during its commission, the accused or accomplice More
This ruling relates to a point in limine raised by the plaintiff to the defendant’s plea in bar/abatement.
The brief background of the matter is that the parties are married in terms of the Marriage Act, [Chapter 5:11]. On 18 February 2019 the plaintiff instituted divorce summons under case number HC 1271/19. On 5 March 2019 the defendant entered an appearance to defend and subsequently filed a plea and claim in reconvention on 7 March 2019. On 20 March 2019 the plaintiff filed a replication to defendant’s plea and also filed a plea to the defendant’s claim in reconvention. On... More
The plaintiff’s case as pleaded is as follows. In 2008 he entered into a verbal agreement in terms of which the defendant agreed to deliver to him an immovable property at 4 Wroxham Road, The Grange, Harare. In consideration of that the plaintiff would transfer to the defendant 167 275 Old Mutual Public Limited Company shares and 110 000 shares in a company known as PPC. Transfer of title in the property would be registered in favour of the plaintiff upon delivery of the Old Mutual shares. The PPC shares would be transferred to the defendant after the transfer of... More
This application for review of a magistrate’s maintenance variation decision on the grounds of bias, was placed before me on the unopposed roll for family matters. Suffice it to state that the failure to respond to the application for review by the judicial officer, who was cited as the second respondent herein, was of no consequence. In the case of Chiremba v Chiroodza and Another 2018(1) ZLR 315 (H), it was stated that a judicial officer cannot be compelled to defend his decision in an application for review. If, as held therein, he or she has not filed any affidavit... More
This is an appeal from the Regional Magistrate’s court. It is against both conviction and sentence. The appellant was charged with 2 counts of rape as defined in 65(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act (Chapter 9:23) (“the Code”). He was also charged with 1 count of attempted rape as defined in s 189, as read with s 65 of the Code. He pleaded not guilty. But after a full trial, the Regional Court convicted him on all counts. Treating all the counts as one for the purposes of sentence, the appellant was sentenced to 10 years imprisonment,... More
