This is an application for declaratory relief wherein applicant is seeking that:
1. Section 156(1)(a)(b)(c) and (e) as read with section 155 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] (THE CODE);
2. Section 157(1) (a) and (b) of the CODE and
3. Section 3 as read with section 6 of the Dangerous Drugs Act [Chapter 15:02] (THE DDA) and section 4(a) and 6(1) of the Dangerous Drugs Regulations 1975 (Rhodesia Government Notice No. 1111 of 1975) as amended by Statutory Instrument 409 of 1999 Regulations No. 4 (THE REGULATIONS). More
Plaintiff claimed $47 700.00 together with interest at the prescribed rate from 7 April 2015 to date of payment plus costs of suit on a higher scale from the defendant from an alleged unlawful use of its trading name and goodwill. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant fraudulently used its certificate of registration. More
On 23 December 1995 Plaintiff and Defendant were married in terms of the then Marriage Act [Chapter 37], now the Marriages Act [Chapter 5:17]. The marriage was blessed with four children who are all majors. On 15 July 2010 Plaintiff issued out summons claiming a decree of divorce and ancillary relief. In his Declaration, Plaintiff stated that the marriage relationship between the parties has irretrievably broken down to the extent that there is no reasonable prospect of reconciliation. More
On 4 November 2004, the applicants brought the above application seeking an order that certain documents filed with the third respondent, relating to the shareholding structure of the fourth applicant be declared of no force and effect as having been forged. It was specifically alleged that the first respondent had forged these documents.
The first respondent, who although not denying that the information in the documents complained of was false, denied being the author of such. In his opposing affidavit, the first respondent avers that he invited the first to third applicant to join as directors of the fourth applicant... More
The appellant (hereinafter referred to as Chidemo) was charged with nine counts of contravening s 136 of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act [Chapter 9:23]. He was convicted on 12 December 2017, after contest,of two counts and acquitted of the remaining seven counts. He was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment of which 1 year was suspended on condition of future good behaviour. A further 2 years were suspended on condition he restituted the Zimbabwe Revenue Authority (ZIMRA) in the sum of USD450 538.61.On 29 December 2017 he noted an appeal against conviction under case number CA 820/2017. On 28... More
