The applicant was arraigned before the first respondent on 8 August 2023 on charge on Frand as defined in s 136 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. Applicant pleaded not guilty and the matter proceeded to trial with the second respondent leading its evidence in a bid to prove its case. There after the second respondent closed its case and the applicant proceeded to apply for discharge in terms of s 198(3) of the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act [Chapter 9:07] (The Act). The application was opposed by the second respondent. The first respondent made a... More
The applicants are facing a charge of robbery as defined in s126(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. They seek, and respondent opposes, their application for bail pending trial. More
The companies failed to pay off their respective debts. The respondent successfully sued the applicant and others under HC 3254/12. Judgment was entered in its favour in the sum of $21 336.01 together with interest thereon at the rate of 10% above the bank overdraft rate with effect from 17 February, 2012 to the date of full payment. It also successfully sued the applicant and others under HC 8650/12 wherein judgment was entered in its favour in the sum of $206 253.93 together with interest at 45% per annum with effect from 10 April, 2013 to the date of full... More
