The applicant and the first respondent are mining entities registered in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. A mining dispute arose between the two entities and it was adjudicated upon by the second respondent. The second respondent’s decision was taken up on review by the applicant and it is pending before this court. Further disturbances occurred on the disputed mining site prompting the applicant to approach this court on an urgent basis. The relief sought is set out in the draft provisional order as follows: More
This is an application for a compelling order. The relief sought is couched as follows;
“1. The 1st Respondent be and is hereby ordered to prepare an agreement of sale for stand number 210 Mt Pleasant encompassing the terms recorded in the offer letter dated 15 December 2016 addressed by the Applicant and signed by the 2nd Respondent.
2. The second Respondent be and is hereby directed to sign the agreement of sale between the Applicant and the 1st respondent as directed paragraph 1 above.
3. The 2nd Respondent processes and signs all such documents as may be necessary to... More
The plaintiff seeks the eviction of the 1st defendant and all those claiming occupation through him from residential premises known as Number 2312 Msasa Drive , Marlborough, Harare ‘hereinafter referred to as the property’ . He also seeks costs of suit on an attorney and client scale. When the1st defendant received the eviction summons, he entered appearance to defend and filed a plea. Subsequently an application for joinder of the 2nd defendant was made and granted. The 2nd defendant also opposed the claim. Although the plaintiff seeks no order as against the 2nd defendant, the 2nd defendant was joined to... More
The applicant herein is a limited liability company incorporated in the United Kingdom. The three respondents companies are incorporated in Zimbabwe. BP Africa Limited (BP Africa) and Shell Petroleum Company Limited (Shell Petroleum) are corporate entities based in the United Kingdom. They are equal shareholders in both the second and third respondents, while the latter companies are equal shareholders in the first respondent. More
The applicant approached this court on an urgent basis seeking the relief for the return of motor vehicles based on the principles of spoliation order or vindicatory action. The applicant’s relief was couched in the following way:
“1. The 1st up to 199th respondents shall:-
1.1 In respect of unloaded and empty vehicles constituting horses and trailers belonging to the applicant which are in their possession forthwith return such vehicles to the applicant’s premises at No. 116 Dagenham Road, Willowvale, Harare upon the service of this order on the 200threspondent or their legal practitioners.
1.2 In respect of loaded vehicles... More
