This is an opposed application wherein the applicant seeks the following relief:
“1. 1st, 2nd , 3rd, 4th and 5thRespondents and all persons claiming occupation through
them on Subdivision B of Sandibloom in Headlands Makoni District in
Manicaland Province be and are hereby interdicted from interfering whatsoever
with applicant’s rights of occupation on the farm. More
The plaintiff and the defendant are husband and wife respectively and they married each other in Harare on 7 March 1990 in terms of the Marriage Act [Cap 5:11]. Prior to that the parties had married traditionally on 21 January 1990 and the same marriage was blessed in church on 28 July 1990. The parties have been married for 22 years. More
The appellants are being charged with fraud as defined in s136 or alternatively, forgery as defined in s137(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. Their application for bail pending trial was refused by the magistrates court sitting at Chitungwiza on the basis that
1. The circumstances of the case are such that if convicted, no court can consider a non-custodial sentence in circumstances where, this, coupled with the gravity of the offense is likely to induce applicants not to stand trial.
2. The case against them is strong given that the computer seized from first appellants... More
The plaintiff issued summons against the defendant her husband, seeking a decree of divorce and ancillary relief. The plaintiff and the defendant were married in Zimbabwe on 6 January 2007. They had both left Zimbabwe in 2002 and were living in London in the United Kingdom. They only came back to marry in Zimbabwe as the plaintiff’s parents are still living in Zimbabwe and wanted to attend the wedding. More
This opposed application is an application for leave to appeal against the judgment of this court under HH390/21 wherein this court dismissed an application for absolution from the instance for the second time on the same matter after having done so under the main case HC2036/15. More
