This is a court application for an order for eviction. The facts are that on 8 May 2017 the Master of the High Court acting in terms of s 120 of the Administration of Estates Act [Chapter 6.01] authorized the first respondent Oliver Masomera (in his capacity as the Executor Dative of the Estate Late Joseph Tawurayi Punungwe DR 2910/16) to sell the immovable property described as Stand No. 208 Malvern Township of Lot 1 of Stand 27 Malvern Township of Waterfall Villa of Waterfall also known as House No. 27A Cassino Avenue, Waterfalls, Harare. More
On the 25th of September 2020, applicant was arrested for a charge of murder as defined in s 47 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23]. On 29 September, 2020 he was placed on remand where upon he was advised to apply for bail at the High Court as he was facing a third schedule offence. This is his application for bail pending trial. More
The applicant was convicted of two counts of stock theft and one count of extortion. He was sentenced to 9 years’ imprisonment in respect of each count of stock theft. In respect of the charge of extortion he was sentenced to 36 months’ imprisonment of which 6 months were suspended for 5 years on condition of good behaviour. A further 6 months were suspended on condition of restituting $200 to Bekithemba Ndlovu on or before 28 February 2019. Appeal against conviction and sentence was noted in December 2018. The applicant now seeks bail pending determination of the appeal. More
The applicant Tapiwa Mangoma is an attested member of the Zimbabwe Republic Police based at Beitbridge Urban Police Station in Beitbridge. He applies for bail in respect of three counts of “Armed” robbery as defined in s 126 of the Criminal Law 9codifuication & Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. In terms of s 126 aforesaid there is no offence called “armed robbery.” The offence is defined as robbery, which in terms subs 3 of s 126, if during its commission, the accused or accomplice More
This ruling relates to a point in limine raised by the plaintiff to the defendant’s plea in bar/abatement.
The brief background of the matter is that the parties are married in terms of the Marriage Act, [Chapter 5:11]. On 18 February 2019 the plaintiff instituted divorce summons under case number HC 1271/19. On 5 March 2019 the defendant entered an appearance to defend and subsequently filed a plea and claim in reconvention on 7 March 2019. On 20 March 2019 the plaintiff filed a replication to defendant’s plea and also filed a plea to the defendant’s claim in reconvention. On... More
