Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
These are interpleader proceedings. Claimant moves me to find that she is the owner of various items of movable property attached in execution on August 29th 2018. More

On 12 July 2017 this court issued a writ of execution against the movable property of DTZ EZOGEO (Pvt) Ltd pursuant to a judgment obtained against it in case No. HC 3162/17. Notwithstanding the addressfor execution being stated in the writ of execution as 14168 Griffin Road, Gun Hill Harare, the judgement creditor directed the applicant(sheriff) to 29 Windmill Lane Quinnington, Harare being the judgment debtor’s new place of business. On 25 August 2017 the applicant proceeded to 29 Windmill Lane Quinnington, Harare where he placed seven vehicles described below under judicial attachment More

The accused, a judge of the High Court of Zimbabwe, is arraigned before the Court on two main counts and two alternative counts of incitement. More

This matter came before me for automatic review in terms of section 57(1) of the Magistrates Court Act [Chapter 7:01]. The three accused persons who were unrepresented faced assault charges as defined in section 89(1)(a) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. It being alleged that on 31 January 2023 at a business Centre in Mrewa one, each or all of them unlawfully committed an act of assault upon Evidence Chiponda by grabbing him once on the neck, hitting him once on the face and stabbing him twice on the stomach with a broken beer bottle intending... More

The two accused were charged with the offence of contravening s 72 (b) of the Magistrates Court Act, [Chapter 7:10]. The charge arose out of the following allegations. On 4 September 2017 a messenger of Court attached certain items of property which belonged to or was under both accused’s possession or control. The property included motor vehicles. The Messenger of Court served the two accused with the appropriate notices of attachment as regarded by law. When he reported to the accused’s premises to remove the property which was under judicial attachment, he established that the accused had removed the property.... More