On 10 April 2025, after hearing oral arguments from the parties’ legal practitioners, the court reserved judgment sine die. The applicant approached the court seeking a review of the first respondent’s decision made on 29 August 2024 on the grounds that the decision was irrational, unfair and motivated by malice and bias. The applicant seeks an order that the resolution by the first respondent to look for alternative land that is not depicted on layout plan TPX/WR/11/15 and TPX/WR/11/15/1 for applicant’s members be set aside; that the first respondent be ordered to finalise its processes in the allocation of residential... More
The plaintiff in this matter is the owner of a Commercial Premises called Silke House situated at the corner of 4th street and Robert Mugabe Road officially known as Stand 16920 Salisbury Township a portion of which is occupied by the defendant in terms of a lease agreement the terms of which are in dispute. More
This is an application for review in terms of s 26 of the High Court Act, [Cap7:06].
The background facts to this matter are as follows:The applicant is a mining investment company duly incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe. The applicant’s directors discovered what they believed to be a disused and abandoned mine at the site of the old Ran Mine in the district of Bindura. The site was then being worked by illegal panners. The directors then enquired with the Ministry of Mines as to the ownership and status of the mine. They were advised that the... More
This matter was placed before me as a court application for leave to institute a class action, in terms of s3 of the Class Actions Act [Chapter 8:17], the “Act”. The basis of the application is set out in the affidavit deposed to by the first applicant as confirmed and supported by the second to the fifth applicants More
On 4 August, 2022, Applicant filed an urgent chamber application for spoliation and interim interdict. The founding affidavit was deposed to by the director of the applicant, Ariginero Muzeya (Muzeya). He gave the following factual background. Applicant and the landlord entered into a lease agreement in 2002 for shop number 4 at Patrick Court in which a Sports Bar was operated. Business and popularity increased and space became an issue. In 2014 they entered into an addendum to the lease agreement whereby applicant leased shop number 5 as well. The two shops were combined into one sports bar.Everything was going... More
