This is an urgent chamber application wherein the applicant sought relief in these terms:
"Interim Relief Granted
First, second and third respondents are:- More
I dealt with this matter as an unopposed application after the respondent which had initially filed a notice of opposition and opposing affidavit did not file heads of argument and did not appear at the hearing despite having been served with the notice of set down. More
The first applicant is a subsidiary of the second applicant. Both companies are Namibian-based.
On 17 August, 2010 the first applicant and the respondents concluded a tripartite agreement in terms of which the first applicant undertook to provide the first respondent with certain software and support services to facilitate provision of free life insurance cover to Zimbabwean cellular phone users and customers of the first respondent against the purchase of cellular airtime from the first respondent. In terms of the agreement, the first applicant would procure, for and on behalf of the first respondent, such life cover from the second... More
On 17 August 2011 the first applicant and the respondents concluded an agreement in terms of which the first applicant undertook to license to the first respondent certain intellectual property (“The Trustco Mobile Concept”) which would facilitate the provision of the free life insurance cover to Zimbabwean cellular phone users and customers of the first respondent against the purchase of cellular airtime from the first respondent. An amendment was made to the agreement in January 2011. More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interim order to bar the respondents from carrying out and/or continuing their unlawful joint operation to demolish illegal structures in the Chitungwiza and Harare areas. The final order seeks a declaratur to the effect that the intended demolitions are unlawful for failure to obtain the necessary legal requirements to undertake the contemplated actions. More
