This is an appeal against conviction and sentences imposed on the appellants on a charge of obstructing or endangering the free movement of persons or traffic as defined in s 38(c) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] ( the Criminal Law Code).
2. Each appellant was sentenced to 6 years imprisonment of which 2 years imprisonment was suspended for 5 years on the usual condition of good behaviour.
3. The trial court found that the first, second, third and fifth appellants had acted in common purpose with those demonstrators who, in Mvurwi Town, had unlawfully and... More
The plaintiff in this matter seeks the cancellation of an agreement of sale in respect of a stand in Vainona, Harare, and an order for the transfer of that stand from the 1st defendant to the plaintiff. The sole issue for determination herein is whether or not the full purchase price was actually paid into the plaintiff’s account. More
The appellant appeared before the Regional Magistrate for the Eastern Region facing two charges. Firstly, he was charged with Rape as defined in s 65 (1) of the Criminal Law Codification and Reform Act [Chapter 9:23] in that on the 10th April 2017 he had unlawful sexual intercourse with a female adult without her consent. Secondly, he was charged with Criminal Abuse of Duty as Public Officer as defined in s 174 (1) of the same Criminal Law Code in that on the same day he gave to the victim two documents namely, a birth certificate and national identity document... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an interdict barring the first and second respondents and any persons acting through them from interfering with the applicant as he retrieve his assets which are currently sitting on the third respondent’s premises in Msasa Harare. More
A brief background of this matter is that on 14 February 2017 applicant filed an urgent chamber application seeking provisionally an order interdicting respondents and any other persons acting through them from interfering with or otherwise disrupting Applicant from collecting his assets from 3rd respondent’s premises at any given time and also that 2nd respondent be interdicted from issuing threats of harm to applicant and preventing or disrupting applicant from carrying out his activities at 3rd respondent’s premises. More
