The plaintiff issued summons, out of this court, claiming payment of storage charges for the period April 2008 to June 2009 in respect of 12 kitchens in the sum of USD 18 0000-00, interest at the rate applicable in the United States of America from date of summons to date of settlement. It also claimed storage charges from 1 July 2009 until the date of completion of the contract calculated at the rate of USD 100-00 per month per kitchen The plaintiff also claims interest on that amount from 1 July 2009m at the sane rate as above, to date... More
: The plaintiff and defendant were joined in holy matrimony on 4 January 2000 in terms of the Marriages Act, [Cap 5:11].
Both parties are domiciled in Zimbabwe.
Their marriage was blessed with two children. The first child was born on 3 October 1993 and the second child was born on 11 May 1998. The parties had initially married under customary law in 1992.
After a period of about 15 years living together the plaintiff sued for divorce alleging that the marriage had irretrievably broken down in that:-
• The plaintiff and defendant have not lived as husband and wife... More
This is an urgent chamber application for an order suspending the procurement process instituted by the first respondent under reference number ZPCR33-2022. The tender was advertised by the Zimbabwe Manpower Development Fund (ZIMDEF), which falls under the first respondent on 9 September 2022. The relevant tender documents are marked Annexure “TC2”, which appears on pages 16-36 of the record. On the return date, the applicant seeks nullification and cancellation of the tender process. This application comes soon after the determination of HC 1727/22, which was an application for review and setting aside of the decision of ZIMDEF awarding a tender... More
I have before mean application filed by the applicant on 15 March 2022for review in terms of section 4 of the Administrative Justice Act [Chapter 10:28] (hereinafter referred to as “the AJA”), and for setting aside the decision of the 2nd respondent made on 22 February 2022. In addition, the applicant seeks the setting aside of the decision of the 1st respondent given on 9 December 2022, which awarded a tender to provide SAP software services to the 3rdrespondent. Dissatisfied with this, the applicant sought a determination of the matter by the Review Panel in terms of section 74 of... More
The applicant filed an urgent chamber application seeking a provisional order which in effect sought execution of a specific clause from an earlier provisional order granted to it. This was in light of an appeal of that order by the first respondent to the Supreme Court despite not having opposed the provisional order when it was sought. More
