The plaintiff filed summons with this court on 4 October 2006 against the defendant claiming the following relief:
a) $15 000 000 being damages for the failure to execute its mandate resulting in the loss of Stand No 5609 New St Mary’s Township Chitungwiza.
b) interest on $15 000 000 from the date of judgment to the date of full payment.
c) costs of suit. More
21 September, 2020 was the return date for consideration of the provisional order which the court entered for the applicant on 10 June, 2015. I considered the application on the mentioned date following submissions which the parties made in regard to their respective cases. I confirmed the provisional order as I was moved to do by the applicant. More
The plaintiffs’ substantive claim is for an order of ejectment of the second defendant from a certain house in Southerton, a middle density suburb south of Harare. The full description of that property is: a certain piece of land situate in the District of Salisbury, called Stand 8540 Salisbury Township of Salisbury Township Lands, measuring 612 m2, otherwise known as 32 Peall Road, Southerton, Harare. Ancillary to this claim is another directing the first defendant to grant the plaintiffs vacant possession of the property. Holding over damages at the rate of $300 per month from April 2010 to the date... More
At the close of Plaintiff’s case, Defendant launched an application for absolution from the instance. As was to be expected, the application is opposed by Plaintiff. Plaintiff issued a summons in his individual capacity in 2016 out of this Court claiming payment, form the Defendant of US$234 500.00 plus costs of suit on a legal practitioner and client scale. The claim is based on unpaid for security services Plaintiff allegedly rendered to Defendant. Defendant defended the action. More
The applicant approached the court with an application for bail pending trial. The applicant is facing four counts of theft of motor vehicles. The circumstances as outlined in State papers attached clearly shows that he approached the four complainants for purposes of hiring their vehicles which he in turn sold to one Phillip Samudzimu. The applicant in support of the application filed written submissions and also oral submissions were highlighted by the applicant counsel Mr Hove. Mr Hove pointed out that the applicant was a Zimbabwean of fixed abode and that he was a suitable candidate for bail. He further... More
