Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant appeared before a Regional Magistrate at Bulawayo on the 15th of February 2019 on a charge of public violence in contravention of section 36(1) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act (Chapter 9:23), in the alternative theft as defined in section (113)(1) of the Criminal Code. Applicant was convicted on the alternative charge of theft and sentenced to 3 years imprisonment with one year suspended on the usual conditions of future good conduct. Dissatisfied with the conviction and sentence the applicant noted an appeal against both conviction and sentence to this court. The appeal is pending. The... More

The applicant is a self-employed taxi driver. On 12th March 2022 he was arraigned before a Magistrate at Bulawayo facing one count of theft as defined in section 113 (1) (a) (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification & Reform) Act (Chapter 9:23). The applicant denies the allegations. On his initial appearance in the Magistrates Court applicant was denied bail pending trial on the ground that he had a previous conviction. This is an application against the refusal of bail. The application was opposed by the state. More

1. This is an appeal against the decision of the Magistrates’ Court sitting in Bulawayo. Appellant was charged with the crime of contravening section 113 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 09:23]. She appeared in court and was released on bail pending trial. More

This urgent application was filed on the 7th February 2020. I heard the parties in chambers on the 13th of February 2020. This is my determination on the chamber application. More

DUBE-BANDA J: This is an urgent chamber application in which the applicant seeks a provisional order staying execution against its property under warrant of execution issued by this court on the 22nd June 2021. The warrant of execution is in the sum of USD $29 700. The warrant of execution is in pursuance of default judgment in HC 457/19, in favour of the 1st respondent. The application is opposed by the 1strespondent. The 2ndrespondent is cited in his official capacity because the implementation of the order sought by the applicant, if granted may require him to act in a particular... More