MABHIKWA J: The applicant filed this application which was served on the respondent on the date of hearing. He opposed the application. It was proposed and agreed that the parties file heads of argument and the matter be determined on the papers. This court then gave directions as to the filing of the notice of opposition, answering affidavit if any, and the heads of argument. More
Applicants filed what they term “Chamber Application For The Removal Of H. Bhikha Enterprises Pvt Ltd Trading As Tilus From Judicial Management.” According to the 1st applicant’s Founding Affidavit, the basis of the application is that;
“1. H. Bhikha Enterprises Pvt Ltd has paid all its approved creditors.
2. H. Bhikha Enterprises Pvt Ltd is now a going concern. Its liabilities are no longer exceeding its assets.
3. The court order that is order No. HC 3343/17 has been fulfilled and consequently H. Bhikha Enterprises Pvt Ltd trading as Tilus Supermarket must be discharged from Judicial Management.”
In that regard,... More
KABASA J: This application was filed on 27th January 2021. Due to the measures put in place in terms of Practice Direction 2/2021 I advised the parties that I intended to dispose of the matter on the papers. I instructed the applicants to serve the application on the respondents who were to file their opposing papers by 29th January if they were so inclined.
The first, third and fourth respondents duly filed their opposing papers, paving way for me to proceed to determine the matter.
The background facts are these: - In 2017 the third respondent fell into financial problems... More
1. This is a chamber application for a mandamus.In his founding affidavit the applicant avers that he is seeking an order to compel the respondents to pay his salary dating back from January 2016 to May 2021. The total claimed is $3 200 000.00. He avers that he is entitled to the amount claimed on the basis of a Supreme Court order in Police Service Commission and Ors v Manyoni SC 7/22. More
This is an application for review. The applicant seeks an order that his suspension be set aside; that he should not be punished by either a reduction of rank or salary without being given an opportunity to be heard; and that if there are allegations against him a hearing de novo must be instituted. The application is opposed. More
