This is an application for a declaratur in which the applicant seeks the following relief:
1. The discharge of the applicant from the Police Service by the 2nd respondent is hereby declared unlawful and wrongful.
2. The 2nd and 3rd respondents are ordered to reinstate the applicant into the Police Service without loss of salary and benefits.
3. The respondents are ordered to pay the costs of suit on a punitive scale.” More
This is an application for review in which the applicant seeks the following relief:
“1. The findings of the board of inquiry which was held on the 16th of February 2017 be and is hereby declared null and void.
2. The respondents are ordered to reinstate the applicant back into the Police Service forthwith with full benefits and privileges as from the 7th of November 2017 up to date.
3. The respondents are ordered to pay costs of suit.” More
This is a court application for a dclaratur wherein applicants seek the following relief:
“1. The discharge of the applicants from the Police Service by the respondents be and is hereby declared unlawful and wrongful.
2. The respondents are ordered to reinstate the applicants into the Police Service forthwith.
3. The respondents are ordered to pay costs of suit on a client attorney scale”.
The applicants’ case is based on the following facts:
On the 26th day of July 2016 they were discharged from the Police Service by the 1st respondent. Both appealed against the dismissal to the 2nd respondent... More
This application was filed as a chamber application for leave to appeal MABHIKWA J’s judgment, which judgment granted the 1st and 2nd respondents’ application for condonation for late filing of an application for review. The chamber application was duly placed before the Judge who ordered that it be referred to the opposed roll. This order was given on 10th March 2020. In compliance with that order the chamber application was referred to the opposed roll and finally set down for hearing in 2022. More
DUBEBANDA J: This is a court application for specific performance. Applicant seeks an order to compel 1st respondent to transfer into his name an immovable property being house number 1046 Chinotimba Township, Victoria Falls, and costs of suit. The application is opposed by the 1st respondent. 2nd and 3rd respondent did not file opposing papers and did not participate in these proceedings. I understand their position to be that they are content to abide by the order of this court, whatever it is. More
