1. This is an urgent application for an interim interdict pending a decision in a hearing on the return date. The applicant seeks a provisional order couched in the following terms:
Terms of the final order sought
That you show cause to this Honourable Court if any, why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
i. Respondent and its members, associates and nominees be and (sic) hereby interdicted from interrupting and disrupting the applicant’s celebration of “Isithembiso” ceremony for all time to come without an order of a competent court.
ii. Respondent to pay the costs. More
This is an application to strike out all processes and court filings made by or under the name and style of the second respondent, purportedly practising as Manase and Manase Legal Practitioners. The application relates specifically to proceedings under case numbers HCBC 371/24, HCBC 386/24, and HCBC 389/24, and is brought in terms of Rule 59(1) of the High Court Rules. More
This matter came as an urgent chamber application. In a 66 page application, applicant in short/simpler terms averred that it and 1st respondent entered into a Joint Venture Agreement (J.V.A.) for the purpose of operating a safari business among other objectives.
Applicant further averred that first respondent breached the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement and was given due written notice of intention to terminate the agreement should it (respondent) fail, refuse or neglect to remedy the breach. The breach was not remedied and the Joint Venture Agreement was terminated. Despite termination, 1st respondent allegedly continued to be in occupation... More
TAKUVA J: The applicants have approached this court on a certificate of urgency seeking the following interim relief.
Final order sought
That you show cause why a final order should not be made in the following terms:
1. The provisional order be and is hereby confirmed.
2. That 1st respondent’s failure to ensure an adequate and consistent supply of clean and safe water to Mkoba be and is hereby declared to be a violation of the applicant’s right to clean safe and portable water protected under section 77(a) of the Constitution.
3. That the 2nd and 3rd respondents’ failure to... More
This is an application for contempt of court. The applicant seeks an order couched in the following terms:
1. The respondent be and is hereby declared to be in contempt of court of High Court cases HC 3183/17 and HC 2031/18 and accordingly respondent is ordered a sum of $10 000.00 for contempt.
2. The respondent be ordered to immediately comply with court orders HC 3183/17 and HC 2031/18 and stop interfering with the applicant’s use, occupation and possession of the Mapari / Devuli Ranch.
3. The respondent is to pay costs of suit.
The application is opposed. More
