Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
MABHIKWA J: The applicant filed anapplication for condonation forlate filing of an application for review in terms of Order 3 Rule 359 of the High Court Rules, 1971. She sought the relief that it be ordered that; “1. The application for condonation of the late noting of an application for review be and is hereby granted. 2. The applicant be and is hereby granted leave to file the application for review of the proceedings in DRGK 92/10 within ten (10) days of this order. 3. The 2nd to 3rd respondents are to pay the costs of this application on a... More

This is an urgent application for the custody of Matilda Panashe Shonhiwa a girl born on 13 June 2002. At the hearing of the matter I dismissed the application and gave an ex tempore judgment. Applicant has since sought written reasons for my judgment and I give them herein. The child being the subject matter of this application is aged about 17 years old. She has been staying with her biological father and her step mother. On one day she left home for school and she never returned. She left school in a taxi that she had no money to... More

On 24th March 2020, the applicant filed a Chamber Application seeking the following relief:- More

MOYO J: This is a chamber application for the upliftment of a bar. The applicant avers that this is an application for the upliftment of a bar effected against him in case number HC 783/20 on the 9th of June 2020 following his failure to file a notice of opposition and opposing affidavits by the end of day on 9th June 2020. The opposing papers related to a chamber application for the dismissal for want of prosecution of HC 371/20 on the basis that the answering affidavit and the heads of argument therein had not been filed timeously. The 9th... More

This is an urgent application for stay of execution. The matter is opposed. The order sought in the Draft Order is in the following terms: “INTERIM RELIEF GRANTED 1. Pending the return date, 2nd respondent be and is hereby interdicted from disposing of applicant’s assets taken in execution of the judgment debt in HC 196/19 by sale or otherwise. TERMS OF THE FINAL ORDER SOUGHT 1. That it be declared that the debt owed by the applicant to 1st respondent denominated in United States Dollars being USD384 177 (as represented by the acknowledgment of debt signed by the applicant on... More