Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The applicant and others are presently on trial in the High Court on allegations of theft of gold. The applicant faces a charge of defeating or obstruction the course of justice in contravention of section 184 (1) (e) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. This charge arises from investigations into the theft of 28kgs of gold from Plumtree Police station Armoury on 15 August 2018. More

This is an application for bail pending trial. At the hearing of the application the state conceded to 1st, 5th, 8th, 9th and 10th applicants being granted bail. They were accordingly granted bail. However, for 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 6th and 7th applicants the state opposed bail arguing that they are a flight risk. More

This is an application for bail pending appeal. The applicant was arraigned before the Regional Magistrate’s Court, sitting in Beitbridge, on a charge of robbery in contravention section 126 of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The allegations against him are briefly as follows: in that on the 19 July 2020, applicant used violence or threats of immediate violence and forcibly took cash amounting to ZAR 14 000.00; a Huwei Y9 blue in colour IMEI number 860673040578786; a Sonny Xperia black in colour IMEI numbers 352562100128050 / 357751107509595, being the property of Kurureni Mukwena. Applicant pleaded not... More

MAKONESE J: This is an urgent chamber application for an interdict. The draft order is in the following terms: “INTERIM RELIEF 1. That the respondents be and are hereby interdicted from carrying out mining activities at True Double Investments Mine at the exclusion of 1st and 2nd applicants and/or denying the applicants the right to benefit from the activities of the 2nd respondent being carried out at the mining site pending the return date. 2. That there be no order as to costs if the application is unopposed. TERMS OF FINAL ORDER SOUGHT 3. That the 1st respondent and anyone... More

The plaintiff instituted proceedings against the defendant claiming the following relief:- “1. An order compelling the defendant to pass transfer to the plaintiff or his nominee, of a certain immovable property, being Lot 3 of Lot 1 of Swaite, measuring 45,4835 hectares situate in the District of Umzingwane. 2. An order directing the defendant to, within 21 days of the date of this order, execute all documents, and take all steps necessary to procure the transfer of the above-described property to the plaintiff, and authorising the Sheriff to execute all documents and take all actions in the defendant’s place and... More