This is an application for bail pending appeal against both conviction and sentence.
The applicants were jointly charged of obstructing or endangering free movement of persons or traffic as defined in s 38 (c) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23] in that, on 15 January 2019 at 174 kilometre peg along the Harare – Mutare Road both applicants or one or more of them unlawfully left or placed on or over Harare – Mutare Road burning tyres with the intention or realising that there was real risk or possibility of obstructing Harare – Mutare Road or... More
According to the declaration, the plaintiff resides in Mutare. He is a registered legal practitioner practising under the style of Mutungura and Partners where he is the managing and senior partner. He is also the Registrar of the Anglican Diocese of Manicaland in the Church of the Province of Central Africa.
First defendant is a former headmaster of St Mathias Tsonzo High School owned by the Anglican Diocese of Manicaland. Second defendant is a school bursar at St Mathias Tsonzo High School. More
Applicant, who is a detective in the Zimbabwe Republic Police received a report of theft of a cellphone gadget on 4 March 2019. After investigations he recovered it from Ernest Jamela a form four student at St Joseph’s Mission, Sakubva, Mutare. He arrested Ernest Jamela and handed him over to the charge office. On 5 March 2019, at his parent’s home he rearrested him over a second cellphone belonging to Delight Mureba. On 7 March 2019 a complaint of assault was lodged by Ernest Jamela against applicant. More
On 7 August 2020 the High Court of Mutare issued an urgent chamber application for execution pending appeal filed by the successful party, the applicant, Associated Mine Workers Union of Zimbabwe. It is a special application where the applicant wants to be given leave to execute the judgment granted under Case Number HC 99/19 dated 23 July 2020. Applicant is seeking the following relief: More
On 12 November 2019 the court sitting at Mutasa Magistrates Court granted a judgment in favour of the Respondent herein and ordered as follows:
1. That the defendant be ordered to pay US$314 112-68.
2. That the defendant be ordered to pay interest at a present rate.
3. That the defendant pays costs of suit. More
