Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The Appellant is employed as a Divisional Intelligence Officer by the Respondent. Proceedings of the Disciplinary hearing were conducted to inquire into and report on allegations that the Appellant had signed two contracts on behalf of the Central Intelligence Organisation with Leggim Enterprises worth forty eight thousand, nine hundred and seventy eight United States Dollars and seventy six cents ($48 978.76) and twenty eight thousand one hundred and twenty four United States Dollars and twenty cents (US $28 124.20) for the construction of a store room and water and oil separator without authority from the Chief Procurement Officer (CPO) PIO... More

This is an appeal against the respondent’s decision to down grade the appellant. The appellant alleges that the decision to demote him is grossly unreasonable, so grossly irrational that the matter becomes reviewable by this court. The background facts of the matter are that the appellant was employed by the respondent as a Research Technician in 1982. Applicant’s qualifications are that he holds a National Diploma in Agriculture from Chibero College, he also holds a Diploma in Agricultural machinery from Germany and a post Graduate Diploma in Agricultural Engineering from Granfield Institute of technology. More

This is an application for condonation of late noting of an application for review of the Respondent to retire the applicant at the age of 60 years instead of the age of 65 years provided in the contract of employment. More

On the 8th January, 2014 Applicant filed an application for condonation of late noting of an appeal against an arbitral award. The award to be appealed against was issued on the 19th October, 2012. More

This matter had been set down for the 24 May 2013. Both parties were informed that matter was postponed to a date to be informed by the Registrar. The Registrar called and advised both legal practitioners that the matter had been set down for hearing on 31 May 2013. Applicant is therefore in wilful default. More