This is an appeal against a determination made by the Designated Agent for the Food and Allied Industries on the 20th of May, 2022. The appeal is opposed. More
This is an application for condonation for late filing of heads of arguments. The brief facts are that an arbitrator ordered that the employer pays its employees an average of $3000-00 each in relation to wages due and payable to the workers.
The arbitrator in June 2014, ordered that the outstanding wages be paid in three months’ time.
The employer had argued that it cannot pay in that time as it would be unduly harsh on a company that is not performing well. They do not deny that the amounts, as ordered by the arbitrator, are due and payable. They... More
This is an application for condonation for late noting of an application for rescission of judgment.
The facts in this matter are largely common cause. Applicant was initially represented by Ms Magogefrom the National Labour Relations Reference Centre. The appeal by the applicant was initially set down for 12 March 2015 before Justice Chidziva. On that date Ms Magoge applied for postponement of the matter to enable her to file heads of argument in the matter. The application was granted and the matter was postponed to 30 March 2015 by consent. Ms Magoge proceeded to file her heads of argument... More
This is an application for the review of an arbitral award which was made on 21 September 2012 in favour of the Respondents (“employees”) against the Applicant (“employer”). Within this review case arose the issue of condonation of the late filing of the heads of argument by the Applicant and also the attendant request to have the bar in that respect lifted. This judgment, therefore, address the two components referred to above. More
This is an application for condonation for late filing of an appeal. The facts in this case are largely common cause. The applicants filed an appeal with this court against the decisions of first and second respondents finding the lecturers guilty of misconduct and imposing various penalties. The facts also show that before the appeal could be heard, the respondents raised a point in limine, alleging that the respondents were incorrectly cited. This court, as per KUDYA J, upheld the point in limine and proceeded to strike the appeal off the roll. The applicants wish to pursue the appeal, hence... More
