Applicants applied for condonation of late filing of an application for review. The respondent opposed the application. I will deal with the matter under two (2) sub- titles namely “Delay” and “Prospects”. More
The appellant, Mr Muzavazi (Muzavazi) is employed by the respondent as a Finance Manager. He was charged with violating s 4 (a) of the National Code of Conduct Statutory Instrument 15/06 (S.I. 15/06) that is, an act of conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of his contract. More
This is an appeal against the decision of an arbitrator. The appellants were employed by the respondent on fixed term contracts. The appellants’ contracts were terminated by the respondent. A dispute arose in respect of the appellants’ entitlements in terms of the contracts of employment. The matter ended up in arbitration. The arbitrator dismissed the appellants’ claims. The appellants are dissatisfied with the award and have approached this court for relief. More
Proceedings in this matter were instituted by way of a Notice of Appeal. The original copy is filed of record. It was date-stamped on 24th February 2014. It has a space for the signature of the person noting the appeal. It is common cause that the person who signed on that space is Ms P. Beta who appeared in this Court as the representative of the Appellants. She works for the Appellants’ trade union that is Detergents, Edible Oils and Fats Workers Union. In terms of section 92 (b) of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01] (thereafter called the Act) a... More
