Welcome to Midlands State University Library

Court Judgements



Browse Court Judgements by court
The appeal was noted as against the decision by the Appeals Committee which confirmed Appellant’s dismissal from employment with effect from 2 September, 2011 on charges of “extortion-proved dishonesty.” The facts surrounding the misconduct charges were that the Appellant who was employed as invoicing clerk, on the 4th of July 2010 used one Tendai Janha’s profile to generate on the computer an invoice for a non-trading company that is Madziwa Trading. The transaction turned out to be fraudulent as the Respondent lost goods through the delivery of goods to a person other than the purported customer shown on the invoice.... More

This is an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Leave is being sought by the employee in a labour dispute between him and the employer. More

This is an appeal against the Appeals Committee of the National Employment Council for the Motor Industry. Appellant was in Respondent’s employ as a foreman. He was brought before the Disciplinary Authority on two acts of misconduct namely – - any act, conduct or omission inconsistent with the fulfilment of the express or implied conditions of his contract - theft or fraud or commits a crime involving dishonesty. More

This is an appeal against the decision of the Managing Director. From the Managing Director the appellant appealed to the Chief Executive Officer who appointed the Human Resources officer to deal with the matter. This court cannot deal with the decision of the Managing Director which has already been appealed against. Furthermore when the appellant appealed to the Managing Director he was not challenging the verdict but the penalty. This penalty was confirmed by the Managing Director as well as the Human Resources Officer. The appellant cannot therefore approach this court challenging the verdict when he only challenged the penalty... More

The Appellant is appealing against the decision of the disciplinary committee. The brief facts of the matter are that the Appellant was charged for forging a National Certificate for purchasing and Supply Management which he submitted to the employer for filing and consideration. More