Appellant appealed to this Court against his dismissal from employment by Respondent. The appeal was made in terms of Section 92D of the Labour Act Chapter 28:01.
At the onset of oral argument appellant raised a point in limine. The point is captured in appellant’s supplementary heads of argument thus, More
The Applicant is a former employee of the Respondent having been employed as a Consular Clerk. He was dismissed from employment following a formal disciplinary hearing. The Applicant was aggrieved with the determination of the Disciplinary Committee. He noted an appeal to this court under case number LC/H/341/19 which matter is currently pending. The minutes of the disciplinary hearing convened by the Respondent that led to the Applicant dismissal however do not form part of the record under reference LC/H/134/19. The Respondent through its papers submits that despite a diligent search it has been unable to locate the minutes and... More
On 14 December 2015 at Harare, labour officer B Chikwanha made a ruling which ordered appellant to reinstate respondent’s employment. Appellant then appealed to this court against the ruling. Respondent opposed the appeal. More
This is an application for review of the decision of the Acting Registrar made in terms of section 45 of the Labour Act [Chapter 28:01].
The facts in this case are common cause. The first respondent applied to the second respondent for a variation of the scope and operation of the trade union. The second respondent published the notice as required in the Gazettegiving the statutory notice. Thereafter the second respondent proceeded to grant the application. The applicants are dissatisfied with that decision and have approached this court for relief. More
